Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Moderator: Modulators

User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1084 times
Been thanked: 1249 times
Contact:

Re: Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Post by NoiseWiki »

image.png
Viewed 772 times
User avatar
banned
Merzfinity
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:41 pm
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Post by banned »

I'm safe - as long as they don't start capturing audio ^
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1084 times
Been thanked: 1249 times
Contact:

Re: Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Post by NoiseWiki »

image.png
Viewed 755 times
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1084 times
Been thanked: 1249 times
Contact:

Re: Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Post by NoiseWiki »

20220411_065720.jpg
Viewed 736 times
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1084 times
Been thanked: 1249 times
Contact:

Re: Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Post by NoiseWiki »

Well apparently big advertisers get a pass .. this image is ok

Screenshot_20220414-065418_Facebook.jpg

But this one is not ..
20220422_103522.jpg
Viewed 702 times
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1084 times
Been thanked: 1249 times
Contact:

Re: Images that based on that other thread should also get your Facebook account restricted

Post by NoiseWiki »

Here's a fine example of why Facebook is fucked up. You can't show closeups of people with ball gags in their mouth because that according to community standards is obscene. But showing a medium shot is totally fine
img_1_1650648589119.jpg
User avatar
RUBBISH
Merzbish
Posts: 3638
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:37 am
Location: Home
Has thanked: 761 times
Been thanked: 752 times

Re: Images that will get your Facebook account restricted

Post by RUBBISH »

Polish_20220516_143914389.jpg
Viewed 673 times
Now I haven't posted this to facebook but I'm gonna say this would be a good image to get banned with.
place holder
User avatar
NoiseWiki
Wiki Bastard
Posts: 3811
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2019 3:38 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 1084 times
Been thanked: 1249 times
Contact:

Re: Images that will get your Facebook account restricted

Post by NoiseWiki »

RUBBISH wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 12:40 pm Image

Now I haven't posted this to facebook but I'm gonna say this would be a good image to get banned with.
This is a good one.. not really sure what FB would do or more specifically what the AI would do. On one hand it's fantastical and they seem to give way to images that aren't real. They make a specific exception for superimposing buttocks and buttholes on public figures but this is a vagina on the face of an unknown person. It also seems to react more readily to images that are full frame with detail. Some of the images I investigated would not trigger the AI if they weren't full frame however one of the images I got dinged for that is exactly that so it's a crap shoot.
User avatar
banned
Merzfinity
Posts: 2458
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2022 7:41 pm
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Images that will get your Facebook account restricted

Post by banned »

NoiseWiki wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 1:24 pm
RUBBISH wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 12:40 pm Image

Now I haven't posted this to facebook but I'm gonna say this would be a good image to get banned with.
This is a good one.. not really sure what FB would do or more specifically what the AI would do. On one hand it's fantastical and they seem to give way to images that aren't real. They make a specific exception for superimposing buttocks and buttholes on public figures but this is a vagina on the face of an unknown person. It also seems to react more readily to images that are full frame with detail. Some of the images I investigated would not trigger the AI if they weren't full frame however one of the images I got dinged for that is exactly that so it's a crap shoot.
I rarely do ironic misogyny, but yeah, she seems cool.
User avatar
RUBBISH
Merzbish
Posts: 3638
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:37 am
Location: Home
Has thanked: 761 times
Been thanked: 752 times

Re: Images that will get your Facebook account restricted

Post by RUBBISH »

drift wrote: Tue May 17, 2022 12:41 am
NoiseWiki wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 1:24 pm
RUBBISH wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 12:40 pm Image

Now I haven't posted this to facebook but I'm gonna say this would be a good image to get banned with.
This is a good one.. not really sure what FB would do or more specifically what the AI would do. On one hand it's fantastical and they seem to give way to images that aren't real. They make a specific exception for superimposing buttocks and buttholes on public figures but this is a vagina on the face of an unknown person. It also seems to react more readily to images that are full frame with detail. Some of the images I investigated would not trigger the AI if they weren't full frame however one of the images I got dinged for that is exactly that so it's a crap shoot.
I rarely do ironic misogyny, but yeah, she seems cool.
Not sure how this is anti woman.
Now I do assume whoever made this didnt like this woman person so it could be anti her but anti all women...naw
or
maybe the creator just thought this was a sicko funny thing to do and it is and a dick on a guys or girls or a dogs face would also be funny.

Sexually humorous/shocking images are not always sexist or anti anything. Some things are just to be stupid and silly.

But then again this could be anti woman depending on how its presented
place holder
Post Reply